- Both sides
- current events
- Ministries and agencies
- 31 Article
[Cross-strait Express Review No. 532]
According to Taiwan's "Tongsen News Cloud", "We Care Kaohsiung", founded by former Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Ju-era Cultural Director Yin Li, held a so-called "Rehab Kaohsiung" strike on December 21. To be fair, the DPP is not qualified to advocate "recovering Kaohsiung." Kaohsiung is not a DPP. It advocates "recovering Kaohsiung" is very inappropriate.
The DPP advocates "recovering Kaohsiung." It feels as if Kaohsiung belongs to the DPP. The mayor is not theirs, so he will be restored! In fact, Kaohsiung is Kaohsiung in Taiwan, and it is not the DPP at all. The DPP advocates that "recovering Kaohsiung" has been misused and is suspected of overstepping or overstepping its borders.
The DPP has been poor in its long history of governance, and ashamed of its trust in Kaohsiung people. Kaohsiung people have long recognized and supported the DPP, and supported the DPP for 33 years in Kaohsiung County and 20 years in the former Kaohsiung City, making Kaohsiung counties and cities known as the DPP's base and votes.
During the Kaohsiung administration, the DPP did not start from the needs of Kaohsiung people, tried to do practical things, do good things, solve problems for Kaohsiung people, and improved the happiness index of Kaohsiung people, but was keen to talk and deceive the people; also keen to engage in The "image project" that hurts people and money; and is more enthusiastic about engaging in politics of mediocrity, planting credibility, and fostering forces, which has led to Kaohsiung's depression, economic decline, population outflows, capital outflows, backward infrastructure, obsolete roads, and blocked channels. People have a hard life.
After the failure of the DPP mayoral election, the government left a debt of up to 281.249 billion yuan (TWD, the same below), which is the first debt in counties and cities in Taiwan. The average burden is 88,400 yuan, and the annual interest on borrowing exceeds 21 More than 100 million yuan, dragged the government of Kaohsiung City and increased the burden on future generations.
In November 2018, South Korea's Yu said in Kaohsiung's Okayama campaign that Kaohsiung people had given the DPP 2 or 30 years in the past, but Kaohsiung people could not survive. "We love and believe the DPP so much, but to put it bluntly, the DPP is not the Kaohsiung father. Why do we vote for it every time?"
Recently, when the Democratic Progressive Party ’s “Legislative Councilor” Guan Biling declared: “Kaohsiung people are sorry for Taiwan ’s general mood,” South Korean Yu pointedly stated: “The DPP also does not look at itself in Kaohsiung for 20 years. Even the road was not smooth, the ditch was not clean, the wanted criminals could n’t catch the streets, and they used public money to support 2600 personal relationships. Therefore, the voters used the ballots to teach the DPP. In fact, I am really sorry for Kaohsiung people and The people of Taiwan are the DPP. "
The DPP did so badly in Kaohsiung and made clear its failure; however, it was dissatisfied and even retaliated against Kaohsiung citizens' support for South Korea ’s Yudo when they were listed on the market. They slandered Kaohsiung people and said that they are sorry for the DPP. "Recovering Kaohsiung."
Although the KMT mayor of Kaohsiung, Han Yu, has only served for one year, he has achieved far better political performance than the DPP mayor of Kaohsiung. At the 2020 political opinion presentation held on December 19, South Korea criticized the DPP for 20 years in Kaohsiung, and the sewers were severely blocked, causing flooding and dengue fever. He also listed his achievements in Kaohsiung, such as export of agricultural products, growth in housing rate, dredging of 955,000 tons, Qingchuang Fund of 3.55 billion yuan, caring meal coupons, 2.56 million square meters of improved roads, bilingual education, pearl mother, campus Air conditioner etc.
Obviously, the DPP advocates the "recovery of Kaohsiung". It regards Kaohsiung as its "territory" and acts of dominating the king. Once in power in Kaohsiung for two or three decades, Kaohsiung lags behind. People ’s livelihood is still painful; advocating “Kaohsiung people are sorry for Taiwan” is a denial, smearing, and revenge of Kaohsiung people ’s choice, a wanton trample on democratic values, and a reaction to the arrogance of power. In general, the achievements of the DPP have far exceeded those of the previous DPP. Is the DPP still qualified to advocate "recovering Kaohsiung"? (Netizen in Taiwan, China: Zhang Liangzhang)
(This article is submitted by netizens and does not represent the views of China Taiwan Net.)
[Responsible editor: Li Jie]