- Both sides
- current events
- Ministries and agencies
- 31 Article
Scanned copy of the certificate provided by Cai Yingwen and Cai Yingwen's office. (Image source: "China Times Newsletter")
China Taiwan Net, December 22-Tsai Ing-wen's "Paper Gate" investigation has made new progress. According to the "China Times Newspaper" in Taiwan, a group of scholars such as Taiwanese professor Lin Huanqiang and Taiwanese senior media person Peng Wenzheng tracked down the "paper thesis" for a long time. Lin Huanqiang said yesterday (21st) that the group of scholars who tracked down the thesis continued There are two new findings in tracking down the disadvantages of Cai Yingwen's thesis, and one of them is to verify the information obtained from the LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science) school. According to a survey by the scholars' group, the University of London did not store a copy of the graduate's degree certificate. This fact has been clearly stated on the UK school website.
Lin Huanqiang posted on Facebook yesterday morning that he believes that the international gold flow is the last veil of Cai Yingwen ’s “thesis door”. An anonymous donation of 30 million yuan (TWD, the same below) may only be The tip of the surface of the iceberg.
Lin Huanqiang said that the key evidence recently obtained by a group of scholars who tracked the thesis was more than one. The investigation has made new progress:
First, LSE's Information and Records Manager clearly stated in an email to Michael Richardson, a freelance writer who cares about Taiwan affairs, that Tsai Ing-wen's oral dissertation at LSE was October 1983. On the 16th, however, it was verified that "the date of the oral examination turned out to be Sunday!" Lin Huanqiang explained that Sunday is the day of worship in churches in most European and American countries. Few people would go to school for work. Doctoral oral exam is not possible on Sunday! Therefore, the scholars can almost be sure that the LSE school founder is compiling a follow-up script of "Thesis Gate", with a view to covering Cai Yingwen's 36 years of deception.
Lin Huanqiang emphasized that in order to further confirm, the academic team surveyed the University of London's Diploma Production Office and responded to an email saying: "Please note that for security and fraud prevention, we do not provide scanned copies of the certificates issued." Obviously, Ms. Ronnie Pereira's "no copy distribution" statement is consistent with the emphasis of the University of London website saying "no copy of the certificate is stored". He wondered where exactly the copy of Cai Yingwen ’s 1984 doctoral certificate came from was a breach of another scandal, but how could Cai Yingwen ’s office be part of the accomplice structure?
Second, I remember that on September 4 this year, Cai Yingwen's office said that they had obtained a copy of the original doctoral certificate issued to Cai Yingwen in 1984 from the British school, and had publicly displayed it with other suspicious documents the same day. However, according to a survey by the Scholars Group, the University of London did not store copies of graduates' degree certificates, and this fact has been clearly stated on the UK school website below.
In the end, scholars such as Lin Huanqiang once again questioned that the evidence for the "dissertation door" scandal is sufficient. What kind of integrity and honesty can Cai Yingwen have? (China Taiwan Net Jia Ruolan)
[Responsible editor: Jia Ruolan]